You have no items in your shopping cart.
Sirius Skinsonic- reviewed and recommended
The answer is no. I am not going to give up my Clarisonic Plus, which has three speeds for the face, a larger body brush and costs $225 for Sirius Skinsonic. However, if you don’t already own a Clarisonic and don’t want to spend around $200 (it costs $195 for the Classic), or even $100 (for the Clarisonic Mia), then the Sirius Skinsonic is well worth considering. It does a creditable job with a few additional bells & whistles and you’ll be getting the benefits of brushing your skin (a great way to gently exfoliate to remove dry skin and keep pores unclogged).
What’s good about Skinsonic
The Skinsonic should really be compared to the Clarisonic Mia – they are both cordless and come with a single speed. However, the Mia has only two brushes (normal and sensitive skin). The Skinsonic has two brushes, a massage applicator (a rubber, spikey head) and a foam head for applying an exfoliator. In my book, an exfoliator applicator is one of those things that you didn’t know you needed because you didn’t. Having said that, I tried it out with Your Best Face Prep and rather enjoyed the feel of it.
I have been testing the Skinsonic for over a week and it’s pretty good. It definitely leaves my skin looking nicely polished. Against the Mia, I think it is doubtless the better option. A small thing, but it should be noted that Skinsonic’s brushes are much easier to remove than Clarisonic’s.
What's good about Clarisonic
I will go back to my Clarisonic Plus for two reasons. Well three, as the most compelling is that I already have it. Then, I really like the Pro’s large brush for body. But the clincher is probably that the motion of the Clarisonic brush when powered seems to be superior. Clarisonic is based on the same oscillating motion technology as the Philips Sonic toothbrush (an electric toothbrush so good that owners of it – myself included – brag that they barely need to floss).
Still, the Skinsonic’s performance is good enough. It’s much better than another low cost brush that I once tested, the Pretika. I also think Skinsonic is better in terms of price and performance than Nutra Sonic. Your skin will benefit from it, you’ll get a few extras over the basic Clarisonic, you’ll get a bargain to boot. For these reasons, I have added it to the TIA store at $49.







Loading...
January 17, 2012
by Marta
Hi wj, if funds permit I would go for the Clarisonic, but if you are budget-conscious, the Skinsonic is a good alternative for any age.
January 17, 2012
by wj
which one do you suggest for a 60 yr old skinsonic or clairsonic
June 4, 2011
by catlover2x
I just bought the Skinsonic and I am very pleased with it. Serums and moisturizers take time to work, but the very first time I used this, I was impressed. I have a few (witchy) moles on my face and the skin nearby is difficult to cleanse without trauma, so I tend to get blackheads in those areas. They are not gone yet, but definitely minimized. Also my skin feels much smoother. I've been using the sensitive brush head to start with and it is very gentle.
March 31, 2011
by Susan
When I bought Clarisonic, I was told it might help build up collagen (I bought it for polishing and pore-minimizing). So if one plunks down $150 less, the collagen is damaged. Oh boy.
I would have asked to see the saleperson's credentials at that point.
:-)
BTW, I love my Clarisonic.
March 30, 2011
by marta
Hi Joyce, I think you are conflating two different things. The Sirius Skinsonic is just a brush (cleansing and exfoliation. LED is different. LED is a light therapy device and the one made by Sirius is called Aurora. http://truthinaging.com/treatments/sirius-aurora-led-device-reviewed-and-recommended