Free shipping on all domestic orders over $39

Astara Radiance Renewal Intense Moisturizer Review

is a Solution for:
Dry Skin, Dull Skin
Astara Radiance Renewal Intense Moisturizer 1.3 oz
January 5, 2014 Reviewed by TIA Community Member 0 Comments
TRU Rating
A lush, reasonably-priced cream with some controversial ingredients low down on the list


Filled in fine lines; added plumpness to hands


Too many nasties

by Phyllis

I volunteered to try the Astara Radiance Renewal Intense Moisturizer ($54) because I had had a good experience with Astara  Golden Flame Hydration Mask ($46).  I tried the mask because it came in one of my subscription skincare packages and my skin was dry and dull.  At that time, the mask was effective – not revolutionary, but effective – and it felt good.

The Radiance Renewal Intense Moisturizer has the same effect on me: it is a pleasant, effectively moisturizing product which, for the most part, feels good.  I used it on my face and the back of my hands for almost a month.  Each time I used it, I noticed it filling in fine lines and giving my hands a youthful plumpness. However, there were some disadvantages to the product, especially since Astara uses some controversial ingredients. Because of those ingredients, I have to qualify my recommendation of this product as “effective, if you are not sensitive.”

For example, I could not use it anywhere near my eyes. In applying the cream, I had to avoid my eye area as if I were applying a mask product.  If I got it any closer to my eyes, they watered and burned.  At first, I blamed it on the fragrance, although the fragrance is light and dissipates quickly, but, after researching the ingredients, I found that Astara uses phenoyxethanol as a preservative. If you access the Truth in Aging database, you will find that this ingredient carries an FDA warning as a potential irritant (see here).  The Environmental Working Group gives the ingredient a score of 4 for moderate hazard.

As I delved deeper into the ingredient list, I found a couple of other substances which are not among my favorites: retinyl palmitate may make you more susceptible to sun damage and cholecalcerifol is banned in Canada. Both cyclopentasiloxane and steareth-2 are listed as low hazards by the Environmental Working Group.

All of these potentially disagreeable ingredients are listed after an impressive list of natural and plant-based oils so the relative volumes of each are small. Agreeably, aloe is the first ingredient listed after water, which is a pleasant surprise.

All in all, I find the ingredient list to be too potentially harmful for my taste, especially given the issue I had with irritated eyes, but I want to emphasize that I am trying hard to reduce my personal exposure to such chemicals. If you are not worried about these particular ingredients, then I would recommend this as a medium-priced, effective, lush cream. In one month, I have used about one-third of the jar; at $54 per jar, this means the monthly cost would be about $18 per month, which I think is reasonable for such a rich cream.  On the other hand, if you are sensitive to some of the ingredients, as I seem to be, there are other creams with less controversial ingredients out there.

Join the discussion! Leave a comment below.

My Comment

Add a comment...

-or- Cancel Comment
* Required Fields
truth in aging's five best

Truth In Aging's Five Best

The very best to choose from for your skin concerns.

Read More

truth in aging videos

Truth In Aging Videos

Helpful how-tos and reviews from Marta and friends.

Watch Now

meet our contributors

Meet Our Contributors

The TIA community consists of our trusted reviewers.

Meet Them

be inspired

Be Inspired

Inspiring thoughts and women who are aging gracefully.

Read More