The Sirius Infusonic sonic infusion device ($129) will not be available until Mar 14, 2012; however, I have been testing a prototype for a few weeks. Normally, testing a prototype would be exciting, but I admit I was frustrated by the lack of available information. Moreover, the information I was given was conflicting, to say the least. Generally, I can size up a product relatively quickly by reviewing the ingredients list, but testing a device is altogether different. The Infusonic claims to use ultrasound technology to infuse skin, achieving “deeper penetration of products.” That’s quite a lofty assertion as there are essentially very few ways to achieve transdermal delivery to skin. The epidermis (outermost layer of skin) has a protective barrier that selectively allows certain substances to permeate skin. Most cosmetic-use ingredients are “macromolecular” or too large to diffuse into skin.
The Infusonic supposedly uses the same technology as the Clarisonic Opal Sonic Infusion System. In fact, I was given the Sept 2010 clinical efficacy study on the Clarisonic Opal as support for the Infusonic. That’s unfortunate because Marta found the Clarisonic Opal to be monumentally unintelligent. Even more regrettable, upon subsequent review of the Clarisonic Opal study, I discarded it because the Opal and the Infusonic employ completely different frequencies, rendering the devices incomparable.
In esthetics, professional ultrasound equipment is used to penetrate products and for cellulite reduction. However, a certain frequency is required in order to use sonic waves for effective product penetration. According to the most recent update (June 2011) to ultrasound technology studies, “low‐frequency ultrasound is significantly more potent in enhancing skin permeability (1-3 MHz).” I was told the Infusonic operates at 6 MHz frequency, which is double the effective threshold of 1 to 3 MHz.
Furthermore, I have found nearly identical devices to the Infusonic all over the web making completely different claims to the devices’ abilities. There is the Ultrasonic facial beauty machine, which uses “photon therapy.” And there are a couple of varieties of the device on Amazon.com that indicate the device uses 5 MHz frequency and claims to be a face lifter of sorts. Science aside, my own use of the device wasn’t exactly successful. I was told that that the Infusonic can be used with any serum, cream, lotion or moisturizer. However, any time I used a heavy type of cream with the Infusonic, there was usually product residue left on the skin, indicating that the product hadn’t properly absorbed.
Does the Infusonic enable sonic infusion? I siriusly doubt it.
Sirius Infusonic- reviewed and rejected

Is a Solution for:
Sagging Skin
September 15, 2017
by Kate
The product has spotty reviews. I recently purchased the Infusonic online. It does charge, beep every five seconds and the application head warms up. However there is no vibration, buzzing or any other signal from the motor to let me know that the device is working and pulsing. Should there be? How do I know it is functioning properly? Thanks
April 30, 2012
by let me stay anon
Awesome! Thanks!
April 29, 2012
by Marta
Yes, we'll be happy to have another tester set up. I'm also interested to see how this works.
April 29, 2012
by let me stay anon
Are you gonna review the final version of this? They had SIGNIFICANT bumps along the road in regards to release date. Maybe they improved it. It does 5 million pulses a second, better than any finger tapping could do, that's why I want to see a rereview if it really stills sucks or not.