Free shipping on all domestic orders over $39

Silicones - Should we avoid them?

October 13, 2008 Reviewed by Marta 21 Comments

Encouraged by an email exchange with Stan, I spent the last few days researching silicones. They crop up in many shampoos, conditioners and moisturizers (as well as breast implants), with aliases such as dimethicone, hydroxypropyldimethicone or amodimethicone. The claims made about silicones are starkly black or white: they are good for you or they are very bad for you. Since both statements are unlikely to be simultaneously true, some Truth In Aging perspective is needed.

Before we go into what is true or false, it is worth knowing that silicone is either an organic or inorganic polymer. And a polymer is made up of many molecules strung together. Depending on the structure of how these molecules link up, polymers could be soft and bouncy, rock hard or gooey and gel-like. Hence, different silicones can play different roles in cosmetics.

Silicones build up on the hair causing it to be dull and heavy - true or false?

This depends on the silicone. Cyclopentasiloxane (CPS), for example, is water-thin so it’s very good at dispersing thicker, greasier silicones. For this reason it’s often used in combination with dimethicone. It is also volatile, which means it will evaporate. So, not only does it help spread heavier silicones, but it doesn’t leave your hair feeling weighed down after it’s done.

Silicones will make your hair fall out - true or false?

The theory is that silicone in shampoos and conditioners builds up on the hair and deprives the shaft of oxygen with the result that hair falls out. This appears to be untrue. The Journal of Investigative Dermatology says: "Silicone-based conditioners, such as dimethicone, are one of the newest agents that aid in smoothing the cuticle and increasing hair smoothness and luster. The silicone is left behind following water rinsing of the shampoo as a thin coating over each individual hair shaft to fill in visible defects in the hair cuticle. Probably the most important aspect of hair cosmesis is combing ease. Increased hair friction snags the hair as the comb is drawn for grooming purposes, resulting in hair breakage. This is the most common cause of significant hair loss in normal patients, patients with dandruff, and patients afflicted with female pattern hair loss. Compatibility of the hair can be increased by smoothing the cuticle and coating each individual hair shaft with an agent to decrease friction. Silicone fulfills this need."

Some people are allergic to silicone - true or false?

I've seen quite a few people remark on online message boards that they are allergic to 'cones. This is mostly likely to be false and they are allergic to some other ingredient (perhaps a preservative). Unlike many preservatives that are known irritants, countless tests have been conducted with silicones that have concluded that they do not cause allergic reactions. Having said that, unmodified silicones stay on or near the surface of the skin. Not only are the molecules too big to physically enter past the upper living cells, they associate with the upper layer of drying skin but they also cannot penetrate cell membranes due to their large size. In some ways that is a good thing, however, they may be preventing stuff - sweat - from getting out. There have been some recent studies that show that prolonged exposure of the skin to sweat that can't escape causes irritation.

Silicones can cause cancer - true or false?

This question came to head when women with silicone breast implants made an association with leakage of the gel and subsequent development of cancer cells. This is where things really get black and white. The evidence for whites (silicone does not cause cancer) looks to be compelling. Until, that is, you come to the realization that the evidence is based on research carried out decades ago. The most quoted is the most problematic. It was conducted by Dow Chemical (maker of silicone) on one group of rats, just after the Second World War.

I also came across a reference to a review of 123 reports on cyclic polydimethlsiloxanes (D3, D4, D5, and D6). The review concluded: "These compounds are volatile and potentially of concern in manufacturing; however, they also are used in consumer products, such as hair sprays, and are found in breast implants, although in very low amounts (see Chapter 3). They are practically nontoxic on ingestion, dermal application, or inhalation, although they are mildly irritating when placed directly on the skin or in the eyes. Subacute gavage studies showed that these compounds had no untoward effect other than a reversible increase in liver weight due to increases in both cell number and cell size at doses ranging up to 2,000 mg/kg. Skin application did not cause toxicity; however, some D5 penetrates the skin."

I was about to breath a sigh of relief until I discovered that the  reports were all 40 years old.

And then I found this: according to research gathered by attorney Richard Alexander, of the Alexander
Law Firm in San Jose, California, Dow Chemical and Dow Corning have been aware of the toxic effects of silicone and silica since the 1950s, based on their own studies, but never published the data. They knew these substances were bioreactive, immunogenic, toxic, and inflammatory when introduced into the human body, states Alexander. (Update on Breast Implants, January 1998, website:

"Silicone degrades into silica, usually at the surface of the gel implant, then fragments and subdivides into millions of microdroplets capable of migrating throughout the body" (according to PSC Records No. 1352, 7017. These are documents produced by Dow Corning in national litigation. Silica in the body is a toxic, carcinogenic substance, damaging the immune system, killing cells, and producing silicosis.

Silicone is toxic - true or false?

True, I'm afraid. The Journal of Toxicology reported that silicone injections led to multi-organ failure. Research collected by the Plaintiff's Steering Committee (PSC) for the National Breast Implant Litigation shows that silicone has marked effects on the adrenal glands and liver, induces chronic inflammation, and degrades into smaller molecules, including silica. Silicone fed to rabbits produced widespread toxic effects including kidney and spleen damage within four months. (Stanford Medical Bulletin, 10:1 [1952], 23-26.) "That silicone is toxic in both animals and man is well proven," stated John S. Sergent, M.D., and colleagues in Textbook of Rheumatology (W.B. Saunders Company, 1993).

OK, but I am not injecting or ingesting silicones and I have the breasts that God gave me, so I am not in any real danger - true or false?

This is a bit trickier and enters a realm dappled with shades of grey. If the silicone molecules are too large to enter the surface of the skin and, as is the case with cyclopentasiloxane (in vitro tests show that less than 2% penetrates the skin), it evaporates quickly, then there probably isn't too much to fear from your shampoo or moisturizer. On the other hand, silicones can help some ingredients penetrate the skin more effectively. Dow Corning sites some research with silicone and hydroquinone in which "the silicone gum induced the formation of a reservoir of hydrocortisone in the stratum corneum".

In the same paper, Dow Corning becomes at best ambiguous about the safety of topical silicones. It cites tests on rats that led to enlarged livers and testicular cancer. But then says, without any back-up, "this effect is not applicable to humans" —provided that the silicone "was allowed to evaporate."

But silicones have some benefit or there wouldn't be so much of it in my bathroom - true or false?

Largely false. Even those that are described as "skin conditioning" or "conditioning agents" are entirely superficial and temporary, imparting a silky, feel-good factor, but without actually doing anything at the cellular level. There is an argument that silicones protect you from other nasties, such as polluted air. Hmm, but at what cost?

Silicones that you can expect to see in cosmetics and hair care:

Dimethicone (also called Polydimethylsiloxane), Methicone, Amino Bispropyl Dimethicone, Aminopropyl Dimethicone, Amodimethicone, Amodimethicone Hydroxystearate, Behenoxy Dimethicone, C30-45 Alkyl Dimethicone, C24-28 Alkyl Dimethicone, C30-45 Alkyl Methicone, Cetearyl Methicone, Cetyl Dimethicone, Dimethoxysilyl Ethylenediaminopropyl Dimethicone, Hexyl Methicone, Hydroxypropyldimethicone, Stearamidopropyl Dimethicone, Stearoxy Dimethicone, Stearyl Methicone, Stearyl Dimethicone and Vinyl

  • October 29, 2018

    by Laura

    In response to Katie...I have very sensitive skin. And I too try to avoid products containing silicone. I find that the issue with skincare products and makeup that contain Dimethicone in particular is that if there is even one ingredient in the formulation that is remotely irritating, the dimethicone creates a barrier that then traps that ingredient next to my skin where it can wreak the most havoc. So while the silicone itself may not be what is irritating my skin, it does effectively exacerbate any irritation other ingredients might cause. (And trying to figure out which specific ingredients are doing the irritating is next to impossible.) I find that my skin looks healthier and is less prone to irritation when I stick to skincare products that avoid artificial fragrances, silicones and where the majority of the ingredients are plant based extracts or oils. But you pay a pretty penny for those products so one has to weigh the cost/value carefully.

  • September 10, 2018

    by Sai

    In response to Annie:
    The issue with glycerine is that it isn't like silicone which is slightly hydrophobic and only interacts with alcohols and surfactants. Glycerine reacts with the fatty acids in your sebum and changes your natural scalp chemistry. On top of that glycerine is itself a polyol (alcohol) and a humectant, so it isn't chemically neutral to the hair itself and is hygroscopic which means it attracts moisture, unlike silicone which repels it, so if your hair gets even slightly wet, all the work put in is undone.

    I do agree that silicone is both a gift and a curse and it's up to the individual to determine that for their hair and scalp type, but glycerine shouldn't be used as a substitute for silicone. They're chemically very different.

  • September 10, 2018

    by Sai

    I just discovered your site and I gotta say I'm relieved that someone is actually delving into the science behind cosmetics and haircare. There's so much pseudoscience and FUD out there along with a good helping of chemo-babble and marketing gimmicks. I'll be disabling AdBlock on here for sure. Also, if you need any help with developing the site, let me know.

  • July 20, 2018

    by Annie

    Hey ladies!

    I'm also one to join the anti- silicone bandwagon despite many of the inconclusive data. Overall, I think silicone and all related ingredients lack advantageous properties (beside the sleek, matte finish), and hence, it is not worth using in our beauty products-- especially, at the cost of our environment.

    GLYCERINE is the natural and perfect alternative! It is a vegetable-based emulsifier, used in many skin and hair care products. Personally, I use organic glycerine to mix with organic aloe vera gel and a splash of my liquid foundation to make a natural and complete safe, beautiful face PRIMER.

    viola! :D

  • April 3, 2018

    by oldladyjanuuary

    although this article was written in 2009, these silicones are in every hair product. I attempt to not use facial or skin products with silicones. Finding hair products with no silicones are difficult and if you can find expensive.

  • January 3, 2018

    by Katie

    Hello. Thanks for the opportunity to connect. So here’s my question...My body reacts poorly to any silicone product. This includes all of the cones that are used as barrier and texture enhancers. In addition, we judge most products by their results not temporary enhancement that washes down the drain. If the products truly worked, you wouldn’t have to use them daily. My skin is actually worse after taking off these products until I apply them again. Does anyone else have similar concern/needs?

  • July 16, 2016

    by Kathrin

    Hi Marta,

    thanks for the article. I´m from Germany and recently discovered Paula´s Choice, but soon realized their stuff is full of silicones. Just as many other cosmetics which are available on the industry´s market. It also gives me a bummer when you find the microplastic in almost every product such as polyethylenes. These all make your skin a glowy looking wonderland but in the end they do nothing for it besides keeping the good stuff "in" for longer because they ´re occlusive (that´s why almost every moisture product contains silicones). I used a La Roche Posay Toleriane Ultra for about 2 years till I realised my skin was getting dry. Always looked good when the stuff was applied, but as soon as I took it off.. So the only thing I can recommend is to get to know all those bad ingredients and to avoid them simply. I also think a small amount of silicones isn´t the worst for our skin but as it is ecologically nondegradable it´s a No-Go- for me (there´s worser stuff like the microplastic). We all should be smarter.

  • April 25, 2015

    by Marta

    Hi Edith, that is a great question. Basically, there are two types of silica - crystalline and amorphous. Studies have shown that crystalline Silica can be carcinogenic, as well as cause inflammation, irritation, toxicity, and other negative health effects. The amorphous, synthetic Silica used in cosmetics and other personal care products does not contain crystalline Silica, and is generally considered safe for use. You can read more on our ingredients listing here:

  • April 24, 2015

    by Edith Thurman

    OK my question is what about silica??? It is now used at 100% pure in cosmetic face powders, also lower concentrations in primers, foundations and almost all cosmetics! So since silica is very small can it cause the problems you are talking about???

  • November 8, 2014

    by Melanie

    I would also like some more sources. I feel the conclusion that it causes cancer is quite a stretch. If it can't get into your skin and it evaporates quickly, it can't cause cancer.
    About it being occlusive-the name for something that keeps things on our skin-that doesn't mean it doesn't let water or air in and out entirely. It just keeps our skin from immediately drying out after we apply moisturizer. That is good thing and many natural oils are also occlusive but I don't hear anyone complaining that olive oil is not letting their skin "breathe"
    Silicones are far more beneficial than stated as well. Anyone who has dabbled in making cosmetics knows the HUGE difference adding a silicone makes! It is the thing that makes your skin and hair feel silky smooth, shiny hair and dewy skin. I too have done research and I feel confident using silicones.

  • October 30, 2014

    by Emm

    I've tried a few of the new BB and CC creams. I realized what made them feel 'soft' was the dimethicone in them. I also tried a plain colorless Dept. Store Primer and its main ingredient was dimethicone.
    I understand that diemthicone is not allergenic but I swear that using products like primer or BB and CC creams make my sensitive, acne prone skin break out. I think they disrupt the cellular turnover on my face, therefore irritating it... I understand that they're supposed to be 'moisturizing' too...and that could be part of the problem but the one CC cream I could find without dimethicone, didn't seem to cause break outs.
    I also understand breaking out isn't an allergic reaction but I just wanted to voice that I find dimethicone to be irritating to my skin.
    I am also concerned about its build up in our environment since it seems to be in EVERY shampoo and conditioner in the market today. Cheap White Rain shampoo is one of the few I can find that doesn't have dimethicone. (I don't like the build up or that my hair gets oily faster if I use a product with it in it.)
    If silicones aren't water soluble, then won't they build up in our water ways?

  • July 5, 2014

    by gabi

    The article is good but not only it lacks a proper conclusion it doesn't answer the most popular question: do silicones suffocate the skin or not? Also, silicones are present on 99% of all cosmetic and skin care products, so how to get away or avoid? I'd like to know a few options for a silicone-free skin care routine. Thanks!

  • February 4, 2013

    by Ieva

    But if I have silicone in my breasts, so I should be afraid of toxic effect?

  • January 19, 2012

    by Karen

    I agree that silicones may not cause allergic reactions but they definitely have caused very bad irritation in my eye area. I narrowed the reaction I get down to anything that has silicones in it. It is the same reaction every time to dimethicone, silicone, and siloxane.

  • December 2, 2010

    by becca

    i'm pretty sure it was injected, not fed to the rabbits. A lot of the research was done in response to the breast cancer scare of the 1990s.

    Haha, I know this is just a blog and all, but could you site some of your sources? I'd love to know where you got the information in the last paragraph

  • December 3, 2009

    by Ruth

    What a fabulous article. This explains so much in a very concise and useful way! Well written. Now to find products without it.... I like to use mostly natural products, which are more expensive, and I looked up the silicone ingredient because it's in my 'natural' body butter - and I wondered what it was. How can we avoid these modern 'wonders', I wonder? We need to get back to what nature supplied somehow... Thanks for the useful info!

  • December 23, 2008

    by Renata

    Thank you for digging up all this onformation about silicones in such great detail. I never knew about them. So it made me wonder, could they be the culprit behind my blackheads? I am starting to think so, because no matter what I do they don't go away. I will pay more attention about what I put on my face from now on.

  • October 17, 2008

    by marta

    <p>Carbomer is a synthetic polymer (large molecule) of acrylic acids. Its used as a thickening agent in cosmetics. Acrylic acids are highly irritating for skin and eyes. However, I could find no evidence that carbomer is in anyway harmful.</p>

  • October 14, 2008

    by Truth About Dow

    <p>See the following website on information about Dow's misdeeds with regards to the environment and human health. They have known about the chemical toxins in many of their products yet do nothing about it.</p>

  • October 13, 2008

    by Stan

    <p>This is great information! I am reviewing a product now that contains lost of silicone - coming soon.</p>

    <p>Now let's find out about Carbomer and is it safe? </p>

  • October 13, 2008

    by LoriM

    <p>I just don't like silicones in my facial products, I feel like they clog my pores. I'm using a microderm scrub right now that is wonderful, but contains so much silicone that it leaves my face greasy afterwards. </p>

Join the discussion! Leave a comment below.

My Comment

Add a comment...

-or- Cancel Comment
* Required Fields
truth in aging's five best

Truth In Aging's Five Best

The very best to choose from for your skin concerns.

Read More

truth in aging videos

Truth In Aging Videos

Helpful how-tos and reviews from Marta and friends.

Watch Now

meet our contributors

Meet Our Contributors

The TIA community consists of our trusted reviewers.

Meet Them

be inspired

Be Inspired

Inspiring thoughts and women who are aging gracefully.

Read More