Free shipping on all domestic orders over $39

Retinyl palmitate sunscreen and skin safety

Is a Solution for:
Sun Protection for Face
June 27, 2010 Reviewed by Marta 7 Comments

Just before Junko prompted me to look at tretinoin safety, several comments were left on a post about another vitamin A ingredient, retinyl palmitate, saying I needed to update my information (a later listing in our ingredients database is more complete) because "this ingredient is known to cause cancer in lab rats and it's being used in most sunblock products". Retinyl palmitate , sunscreen and skin has indeed been in the news recently. So what's been going on and should we sound A for Alert?

The main reason that retinyl palmitate (RP) caught the news headlines earlier this month is that Senator Charles Schumer urged the Food and Drug Administration to publish its findings on RP. The FDA has been reviewing data from several studies on a potential link between retinyl palmitate and cancer risks since July 2009, but has yet to issue any rulings or guidelines.

In May, the EWG issued press releases calling on the FDA to act because RP is a common sunscreen ingredient. Specifically, the FDA research teams have been looking at what happens to RP in UV light, regardless of what it is formulated in. However, the researchers note that it is an ingredient that is increasingly used in cosmetics.

A 2005 study on mice by the FDA's National Center for Toxicological Research to evaluate the photomutagenicity of RP in cells when exposed to ultraviolet A (UVA) light concluded: "These results suggest that RP is photomutagenic in combination with UVA exposure in mouse lymphoma cells." A year later in 2006, another study, concluded: "Our results demonstrate that, similar to irradiation with UVA light, RP can act as a photosensitizer leading to free radical formation and induction of lipid peroxidation following irradiation with UVB light."

Another research team failed to replicate these results on hamsters (although they specifically looked at the ovaries) and concluded there was no evidence that RP is toxic. The only thing is that they conducted the research for L'Oreal.

There is some – as far as I know – independent research that may contradict the 2005/6 research. But it goes back to 1999 and says that "topical application of retinol does not result in changes in constitutive plasma levels of retinol and, therefore, does not increase the risk for developmental toxicity. (source)

Even more confusingly, there are 2003 and 2005 studies that showed that topical application of RP acted as a sunscreen at 2% concentrations, protecting the skin from UV damage (source).

In 1987, the Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel (a body that is funded by the cosmetics industry) found that retinol and retinyl palmitate were safe as cosmetic ingredients "in the practices of use and concentration ranges used (up to 13%)". And they have basically been sticking with that story ever since. The CIR recently changed its name to The Personal Care Products Council and has been quick to say that EWG has pounced on sunscreens even though the FDA's research is on RP and sunlight, regardless of what it is formulated in.

The EWG may not have done itself a favor by creating a link between RP safety in sunlight and its own controversial report on sunscreen safety. A search on Truth In Aging threw up very few examples of RP present in sunscreens – a notable exception being Murad. It does crop up, however, in cosmetic products that happen to also contain a sunscreen, although that's not their primary role (eg KaplanMD's Lip 20).

For the time being, I'm going to keep my council until the FDA publishes its findings.

  • September 22, 2011

    by Jae

    I just bought some retinyl-palmitate cream in the hopes of diminishing some dark facial spots. Was this a mistake in judgement? I don't want to use a bunch of chemicals on my face, but the spots are making me feel bad about myself and money IS an object.

  • June 29, 2010

    by marta

    I use the "clear" Colorscience, which is invisible. Easy to apply and my very sensitive skin likes it. I'm going to have them in the shop in a week or so.

  • June 28, 2010

    by Jaysie

    Marta - Which ColorScience product do you use? I was using the Devita 30 for the last couple of months and found that it clogged my pores so I've relegated it to my hands/arms for incidental exposure. Then I started using the Peter Thomas Roth loose SPF powder, but it flies around so much I feel like I have to hold my breath and close my eyes to apply it. I looked at ColorScience last year and couldn't decide on a good color match.

  • June 28, 2010

    by marta

    Aubrey, well spotted! Although a shame to give up Devita. I'm pretty much down to ColorScience now.

  • June 28, 2010

    by Aubrey

    I'm so glad you posted about this issue because it's been on my mind ever since I read the comment on the earlier post. Turns out I'm going to have to reconsider my use of Devita Solar Block Body. I bought it because I thought it was the same as the facial version recommended by EWG--just more product for the same price. But guess what, the body version has Vitamin A (in the form of retinol listed on the back of my bottle).

  • June 28, 2010

    by Jaysie

    Eric - Thanks so much for such an easy-to-understand explanation. Wouldn't you think the chemists who formulate sunscreens would consider this when cooking up a product? Geez...

  • June 28, 2010

    by Erik Kreider

    The major reason vitamin A and its derivatives should not be used in sunscreens is biochemically obvious - Vitamin A induces skin remodeling - which means it encourages skin cells to divide. In sunscreens, this is like pouring gasoline on a fire - the fire being the damage that's been done to skin cell DNA by UV radiation. Skin cells need time to repair such damage, but one can imagine that if at the same time another compound (Vit A) is telling the cell to divide, it may do so WITH the DNA damage, thereby propogating the DNA damage without it being properly repaired. Such reproduced DNA damage is a primary cause of carcinogenic processes.

Join the discussion! Leave a comment below.

My Comment

Add a comment...

-or- Cancel Comment
* Required Fields
truth in aging's five best

Truth In Aging's Five Best

The very best to choose from for your skin concerns.

Read More

truth in aging videos

Truth In Aging Videos

Helpful how-tos and reviews from Marta and friends.

Watch Now

meet our contributors

Meet Our Contributors

The TIA community consists of our trusted reviewers.

Meet Them

be inspired

Be Inspired

Inspiring thoughts and women who are aging gracefully.

Read More